Company of Heroes: Eastern Front

Other discussions (Read-Only) => Off Topic => Topic started by: Walther von Brauchitsch on December 16, 2013, 02:15:16 PM

Title: COD: Ghosts vs BF4
Post by: Walther von Brauchitsch on December 16, 2013, 02:15:16 PM
I think COD has better graphics, and their multiplayer, I like COD more because on battlefield, you have super OP weapons when your high level so its unfair for lower levels. Single player, didn't play singleplayer.
Title: Re: COD: Ghosts vs BF4
Post by: Blackbishop on December 16, 2013, 05:31:53 PM
Lol... at least COD single player campaign is always entertaining.
Title: Re: COD: Ghosts vs BF4
Post by: Tom on December 16, 2013, 05:34:24 PM
Lol... at least COD single player campaign is always entertaining.

Ha ha, you're so right. I play cod only for campaigns. Last time i played multiplayer it was COD2.
Title: Re: COD: Ghosts vs BF4
Post by: Walentin 'Walki' L. on December 16, 2013, 06:59:57 PM
Oh god somebody opened Pandora's box. Let the fight begin!

COD Singleplayer campaigns and the BF Singleplayer campaigns. Are action overloaded, often do not make any sense and are linear like y=m*x+b. They should just skip that shit really. Their campaigns feel more like shoot em' ups, where you run from one position to the other just to do the same thing again. If you know cynicalbrit (the youtube channel), he pretty much brought it to the point (can't find the video atm).

It's just like you are playing a film, in which you just have to make decisions that do not matter in the end anyway, cause the ending will always be the same. Not even starting to mention those dumb passages in which you have to take a shot at somebody who just stands still and nothing happens if you do not shoot, the scene just remains looping there.
Title: Re: COD: Ghosts vs BF4
Post by: Dzierzan on December 16, 2013, 11:49:04 PM
I guess you meant y=ax+b ;).

But anyway, you're right Walki.
Title: Re: COD: Ghosts vs BF4
Post by: Dann88 on December 17, 2013, 01:32:23 PM
I like the spec ops of CoD though. I like both of them but most of Vietnamese guys (and some gals) play CoD so I have to follow the trend. And I loved the CoD party LAN, fun all the way!
As long as I have fun I will play it
Title: Re: COD: Ghosts vs BF4
Post by: Jäger on December 17, 2013, 03:36:16 PM
They're both bad games, simple as that.
Title: Re: COD: Ghosts vs BF4
Post by: Walentin 'Walki' L. on December 17, 2013, 04:27:07 PM
I guess you meant y=ax+b ;).

But anyway, you're right Walki.

Oh right forgot the x.
Title: Re: COD: Ghosts vs BF4
Post by: Sommarkatze on December 23, 2013, 05:46:53 PM
Havent tried BF4 but I really enjoyed all the earlier BFs games. Especially with the frostbite engine where you can destroy walls and all that shit, The COD engine is like... from 2003 ? Dont get me wrong, its a good engine but you can really destroy that much stuff like in BF and destroying is always fun ;)

BF also got vehicles and other cool stuff! :D The only thing I want is BF to go back to ww2 <3


Edit: Whats up with players this days? All the highlevels got super OP weapons? I mean come on thats half the fun. Everybody is crying about balance between the two teams.
Take ww2 for example where Americans have semi automatic rifles and the German got bolt action.

 You cant seriously make a ww2 game any longer because everybody would go bananaz and screaming about the Americans being OP XD
(RO2: Rising storm for example where everybody says the Americans are OP, jesus I win as the japanese all the time?)

 I mean, use captured guns? Keep them on distance? Deal with it and try to get to that lvl too? It a bigger challange if you use a ¨worse¨ weapon than the opponent. The bigger the challange, the bigger the fun <3