Company of Heroes: Eastern Front

Eastern Front Mod (Read-Only) => Community Events and Tournaments => The Great Patriotic War => Topic started by: Cranialwizard on May 13, 2012, 04:30:25 AM

Title: Sector Co-relation to Maps 2.0
Post by: Cranialwizard on May 13, 2012, 04:30:25 AM
Hello there!

Here is the initial, untouched map, before the tournament will start to let you see the different sectors. Beneath it will be a full list of the territories and the maps that co-relate to the territory.
Every week, this post will be updated in order for you to see where your armies currently are and to plan which territory to attack next.

Special thanks to MaxiKing6 for his hard work on the map! You rock, man!


(Right-click on the map and choose show image to see a bigger sized version)

(http://img836.imageshack.us/img836/2981/round13a.jpg)

Hey Guys, this board is under some changes. The key is now as follows:

Key:
Allied Control
Soviet Control
Axis Control
Stackable (3 wins needed to take control)
CAPITAL (Crucial point)

SECTOR LIST:
Number      Territory name            Map played                                                                        Occupied by
1UtahBeach Assault ( 2 )-
2OmahaPointe du Hoc ( 4 )-
3BocageSemois ( 2 )-
4BretagneBernieres-sur-Mer ( 2 )Riggsman
5LoireRoad to Montherme ( 4 )-
6Southern FranceEcliptic Fields ( 4 )-
7DragoonHedgerow Siege ( 6 )Vrachos/Eftapsihos
8BurgundyScheldt ( 6 )CER10TY/TankBuster/EasyCalic
9ParisDuclair ( 4 )JB23/ZackMckenna/Mr.Q/COHModdersolo
10BelgiumLangres ( 2 )Dot.Shadow/Sommarkatze
11Battle for VerrieresVerrieres Ridge ( 2 )-
12NetherlandsBedum ( 4 )-
13FrieslandWolfheze ( 4 )-
14ArdennesMontherme ( 6 )FishhunterX/MichaelCycle
15Ruhr AreaSturzdorf ( 2 )-
16Alsace-LorraineHalbe ( 6 )Hietler/KingMydus
17Lower SaxonyMontargis Region ( 8 )-
18Schleswig-HolsteinGilroy's Harbour ( 4 )-
19Western PomaraniaDrekplaats ( 6 )-
20BerlinBerlin ( 8 ), Rails and Metal ( 4 )[/b]-
21Seelow HeightsSeelow ( 6 )-
22SaxonyHill 331 ( 6 )-
23BavariaSt. Mere Dumont ( 2 )-
24AustriaMcGechaen's War ( 4 )-
25ViennaVienna ( 2 ), Villers Bocage ( 6 )-
26Bohemia and MovariaAngoville Farms ( 2 )-
27Lower SilesiaDuclair ( 4 )-
28Eastern PomaraniaKarachev ( 2 )Deadmetal
29Eastern PrussiaRails and Metal ( 4 )Godlikedennis/Darcreaver/Apeman/Glimmerman
30WarsawLorraine ( 4 )Yau/3457wood
31MasuriaGrodno ( 4 )[SBI]Keule/SublimeSimuz
32SlovakiaBest ( 2 )panthertank67
33Western HungaryEtavaux ( 4 )Panzer4life
34Eastern HungarySt. Hilaire ( 4 )Dann88/DreamerBG/Evisela/JHiemstra
35RomaniaMcGechaens War ( 4 )DaBadman331/E-Gon
36MoldaviaDuclair ( 4 )-
37LembergLemberg ( 4 )Cranialwizard
38BrestRuins of Rouen ( 2 )-
39LithuniaLangres ( 2 )-
40LatviaBeaux Lowlands ( 2 )-
41EstoniaEcliptic Fields ( 4 )-
42LeningradLeningrad ( 6 ), Rails and Metal ( 4 )-
43PstovMahiljou ( 4 )-
44DemyanskKarachev ( 2 )-
45SmolenskPsel ( 2 )-
46MinskMinsk ( 4 )-
47UmanWrecked Train ( 2 )-
48KievKiev ( 6 )-
49OdessaCarpiquet ( 2 )-
50KrimSevastopol ( 4 )-
51Maikop Oil FieldsRefinery ( 6 )-
52GroznyRed Ball Express ( 6 )-
53KotelnikovoKotelnikovo ( 2 )-
54RostovRostov ( 8 )-
55KharkovKharkov ( 2 )-
56KalachKalach ( 6 )-
57StalingradStalingrad Railroad Station (4), Dom Pavlova( 4 )-
58GorodishcheZhytomyr ( 6 )-
59VoroneshIndustrial Riverbed ( 2 )-
60KurskKursk ( 4 )-
61OrshaFlooded Plains ( 2 )-
62TulaKholm ( 4 )-
63MoscowMoscow ( 2 ), Steel Pact ( 4 )-

Please note: The territory named "Soviet Retreat" can't be conquered by Axis armies. It's meant to be a last rally point for the Soviets, so they can't be beaten out of their own country.

August 21st: Conversion to 2.0 Complete.
Title: Re: Initial Map and Correlation to Maps
Post by: neosdark on May 13, 2012, 05:31:48 AM
Perhaps you should show the starting position for Operation Barbarossa (Sector wise) on this map, its not like they will start already in Soviet Territory, no?

EDIT: Just draw a big Black (or Red) line through the border between sectors 29-35 and 36-40 indicating starting positions for Op. Barbarossa
Title: Re: Initial Map and Correlation to Maps
Post by: Cranialwizard on May 13, 2012, 05:42:51 AM
Quote from: neosdark on May 13, 2012, 05:31:48 AM
Perhaps you should show the starting position for Operation Barbarossa (Sector wise) on this map, its not like they will start already in Soviet Territory, no?

EDIT: Just draw a big Black (or Red) line through the border between sectors 29-35 and 36-40 indicating starting positions for Op. Barbarossa

There is a line on the "Untouched" map copy that I own. The border will be definite when the Round 1 map is posted.

To be clear, this is the sector map without any faction ownership so everyone gets a pretty clear idea on what is what.

In several hours the official start of Round 1 will begin where people can begin to make their attack orders. At that point, the Axis will begin to make their request to attack sectors and then Allies will choose whom will defend those sectors. From there, players will be in those designated areas for the time being.
Title: Re: Initial Map and Correlation to Maps
Post by: neosdark on May 13, 2012, 05:49:05 AM
Alrighty thanks for clearing that up
Title: Re: Initial Map and Correlation to Maps
Post by: Max 'DonXavi' von B. on May 13, 2012, 09:07:26 AM
Actually this was only a draft of the final map and NOT meant to be the final version. I will update it in a few hours.

/updated

/updated map and territory table
Title: Re: Initial Map and Correlation to Maps
Post by: Max 'DonXavi' von B. on May 13, 2012, 12:10:10 PM
Right lads, now the time has come to set up your armies! Organize a team meeting and discuss which players should be sent to the front first. Other players will act as reserve until they are needed, either on the Eastern or on the Western Front.

Allies: Remember that a certain amount of you guys will have to take part in the Invasion of Normandy - so decide wisely and don't just order your best players to defend mother Russia. Once switched to the Western Front, there's no way back except in case Operation Overlord or Dragoon fail.

Axis: Same for you. There'll be a second front sometime in the future, remember to think about your human ressources in order to be able to win on both frontlines.
Title: Re: Initial Map and Correlation to Maps
Post by: Cranialwizard on May 13, 2012, 02:13:11 PM
Quote from: MaxiKing6 on May 13, 2012, 12:10:10 PM
Right lads, now the time has come to set up your armies! Organize a team meeting and discuss which players should be sent to the front first. Other players will act as reserve until they are needed, either on the Eastern or on the Western Front.

Since sectors 37 and 38 are Best of 3, perhaps 3 sets of battles can be lined up for those sectors including such reserve players?
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Max 'DonXavi' von B. on May 13, 2012, 02:45:43 PM
Good idea, I agree :)
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: tac0 on May 13, 2012, 04:27:58 PM
You should have added Buda Pest as the Russian had to have a full scale Siege on it and it could replace or just be in the middle of Hungary.
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Cranialwizard on May 13, 2012, 04:32:18 PM
Quote from: tac0 on May 13, 2012, 04:27:58 PM
You should have added Buda Pest as the Russian had to have a full scale Siege on it and it could replace or just be in the middle of Hungary.

Perhaps, but I feel that the map doesn't have to be picture perfect even if it is fairly accurate. I would like to think that the battles in Western/Eastern Hungary would be represented by playing on the selected maps. Besides, I think that the map is already pretty much set in stone so I think it'll be fine.

Hope that this is ok.
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Riggsman on May 13, 2012, 05:25:26 PM
I named the locations with map names to make it easier- actually I did it for myself but maybe some will find this easier to concentrate. Some areas were too small to write the name in but i guess even actual one is readable anyway.
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Cranialwizard on May 13, 2012, 05:30:28 PM
Quote from: Riggsman on May 13, 2012, 05:25:26 PM
I named the locations with map names to make it easier- actually I did it for myself but maybe some will find this easier to concentrate. Some areas were too small to write the name in but i guess even actual one is readable anyway.

Very nice map! This would come in handy for those whom don't like list :)
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Max 'DonXavi' von B. on May 18, 2012, 10:08:11 PM
Allies, please post where you retreated to after your defeats.
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Cranialwizard on May 18, 2012, 10:40:04 PM
I would suggest sector #38 be reduced to Simuz, Stealth as an alternate.

I would like to make the edition: Sector #37 can connect to Sector 46

I will be chilling in Minsk.
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: CER10TY on May 18, 2012, 10:52:19 PM
I'll be going to Minsk, but just because Cranial is there. :P
And yes, I'm serious.
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Kleinburger on May 18, 2012, 11:36:58 PM
didn't Kuele fight in #49 ? how did he end up retreating to prussia ?
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Max 'DonXavi' von B. on May 18, 2012, 11:41:31 PM
My bad. Corrected it ;)
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: GodlikeDennis on May 19, 2012, 10:59:16 AM
Crani will retreat to 49.

Darc and Neos to 39.

Glimz and Ape to 46.
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Cranialwizard on May 19, 2012, 12:50:45 PM
WARNING: Sector 36 will be changed to Duclair (4p) because Kotel (4p) does not exist in EF 1.6.0.2.
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Dann88 on May 30, 2012, 06:48:34 AM
Update the map please.
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Max 'DonXavi' von B. on May 30, 2012, 08:25:42 PM
I'm eaten up by a shitload of work at the moment, but will do my best to update the map this evening.

Map updated. Fuck the rest.
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Cranialwizard on May 30, 2012, 08:57:28 PM
Quote from: MaxiKing6 on May 30, 2012, 08:25:42 PM
I'm eaten up by a shitload of work at the moment, but will do my best to update the map this evening.

Map updated. Fuck the rest.

Don't worry about positions. Ultimately that's going to be a pain in the ass to edit and we'll play by ear.
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Dann88 on May 30, 2012, 10:31:04 PM
Positions are now a mess. I'm cool if everyone is cool. :)
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: GodlikeDennis on May 31, 2012, 08:06:01 AM
As far as I can remember, the current positions for deployed players are these:
Allies
GLD/Darc/Neos 39
Ape/Glimz/Cer1oty 46
Crani/Kleinburger 55

Axis
Yauz 29
Simuz/Stealth/Drokslit 38
Ashes/Dzierzan 37
Snugz 49
Keule 36 or 47?
Panzer4life 47
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: stealthattack1 on June 07, 2012, 12:47:50 AM
just a question, it says for the stacked territories that attackers must have 3/3 wins. for D-day, are the allies considered attackers or the axis?
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Evisela on June 07, 2012, 01:54:55 AM
Quote from: stealthattack1 on June 07, 2012, 12:47:50 AM
just a question, it says for the stacked territories that attackers must have 3/3 wins. for D-day, are the allies considered attackers or the axis?

There is an exception for D-Day, if you look.
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Cranialwizard on June 07, 2012, 03:08:35 AM
Quote
Stacked games will be 3 games total. The Aggressor must win all of these games, except in the case of D-Day where the Axis must win all of these games.
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: stealthattack1 on June 07, 2012, 05:44:17 PM
alright, thanks for clearing that up. i thought this was the case, but i just wanted to make sure.
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Cranialwizard on June 12, 2012, 07:43:05 PM
I would like a list of Axis retreat positions, else I will infer where players will go .
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Alexander 'ApeMen' J. on July 09, 2012, 08:27:29 PM
map updated^^
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Dann88 on July 09, 2012, 08:32:11 PM
site don't allow
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: GodlikeDennis on July 10, 2012, 07:31:14 PM
Is someone going to fix the map?
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Walentin 'Walki' L. on July 11, 2012, 09:12:47 PM
MaxiKing is away till Thursday, 19th.
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Dreamerbg on July 11, 2012, 09:36:57 PM
What is needed to be done ?
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Alexander 'ApeMen' J. on July 15, 2012, 10:50:56 PM
Quote from: GodlikeDennis on July 10, 2012, 07:31:14 PM
Is someone going to fix the map?

im updating the map
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: GodlikeDennis on July 18, 2012, 11:09:04 AM
Please upload the map to a different site. I'm not allowed to view it where it is.
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Cranialwizard on July 18, 2012, 02:40:20 PM
It hasn't been updated anyway. Ape, will you please update it?
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Max 'DonXavi' von B. on July 22, 2012, 04:19:11 PM
I may take care of it again now. Just have to do it on my PC and upload the map via phone.
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Max 'DonXavi' von B. on July 22, 2012, 05:38:29 PM
Updated ;)
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Kleinburger on July 31, 2012, 03:51:32 PM
Update ?
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Max 'DonXavi' von B. on July 31, 2012, 09:55:29 PM
Ouch, may take a while. Is tomorrow ok? I have barely time to do anything regarding Eastern Front at the moment. Please excuse me :(
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Cranialwizard on July 31, 2012, 10:26:48 PM
Quote from: MaxiKing6 on July 31, 2012, 09:55:29 PM
Ouch, may take a while. Is tomorrow ok? I have barely time to do anything regarding Eastern Front at the moment. Please excuse me :(

Take your time ;)
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Max 'DonXavi' von B. on August 05, 2012, 11:53:11 AM
Map updated!
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: 3457wood on August 06, 2012, 11:04:56 AM
Dont know, but is "BEST" not in German Hands now ?
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Dreamerbg on August 06, 2012, 11:16:49 AM
The map update is before this round.
It shows how map looks like at the start of round 11.
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: 3457wood on August 06, 2012, 02:03:12 PM
ok thx 4 info
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Max 'DonXavi' von B. on August 06, 2012, 04:03:02 PM
Update incoming soon.
/Done
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Cranialwizard on August 06, 2012, 04:36:38 PM
Thanks man :)
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
Post by: Dabadman331 on August 08, 2012, 04:42:41 PM
Chilling out in sector 35
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps 2.0
Post by: Dreamerbg on August 21, 2012, 04:23:28 PM
LOL

35   Romania   McGechaens War ( 4 )   DaBadman331/E-Gon

How E-gon comes in Romania  :-X
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps 2.0
Post by: Cranialwizard on August 21, 2012, 05:53:25 PM
Quote from: Dreamerbg on August 21, 2012, 04:23:28 PM
LOL

35   Romania   McGechaens War ( 4 )   DaBadman331/E-Gon

How E-gon comes in Romania  :-X

The request to move there was put in a week ago, and since I didn't have the map I forgot that #35 is cut off.

This will no longer happen next round, so far, the Axis have done it twice and the Allies once. You may not reinforce cut off sectors.
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps 2.0
Post by: Dreamerbg on August 21, 2012, 06:01:25 PM
Another question

10   Belgium   Langres ( 2 )   Dot.Shadow/Sommarkatze

Sommarkatze were cuted of in #35 I dont think he can switch fronts ... and if he can - its strange...  :)
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps 2.0
Post by: Cranialwizard on August 21, 2012, 06:03:31 PM
Quote from: Dreamerbg on August 21, 2012, 06:01:25 PM
Another question

10   Belgium   Langres ( 2 )   Dot.Shadow/Sommarkatze

Sommarkatze were cuted of in #35 I dont think he can switch fronts ... and if he can - its strange...  :)

He is switching fronts this round but can not attack. Check the Penalty box thread.
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps 2.0
Post by: Max 'DonXavi' von B. on August 27, 2012, 06:10:00 PM
Map updated. Sorry for the delay.
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps 2.0
Post by: Pac-Fish on August 27, 2012, 06:11:27 PM
TY for the map but you know sector 5 belongs to Axis right? ;)
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps 2.0
Post by: Max 'DonXavi' von B. on August 27, 2012, 06:14:11 PM
No I don't because this place the opposite of tidy. Next round.
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps 2.0
Post by: GodlikeDennis on August 27, 2012, 07:32:12 PM
#37 is in Axis hands too.
Title: Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps 2.0
Post by: Cranialwizard on August 27, 2012, 09:17:41 PM
Quote from: MaxiKing6 on August 27, 2012, 06:14:11 PM
No I don't because this place the opposite of tidy. Next round.

I had updated the sectors for round 13. Not for 14 yet sorry :/