Company of Heroes: Eastern Front

Eastern Front Mod (Read-Only) => Suggestions => Topic started by: Prometheus on August 16, 2009, 02:36:24 PM

Title: Lend and Lease Act
Post by: Prometheus on August 16, 2009, 02:36:24 PM
Hey are getting the Sovjets some Shermans of the Lend and Lease Act?

And are getting the germans some caputered T-34?
Title: Re: Lend and Lease Act
Post by: MrScruff on August 16, 2009, 03:05:26 PM
Hey are getting the Sovjets some Shermans of the Lend and Lease Act?

And are getting the germans some caputered T-34?

1. no
2. no - or maybe, as a doc-unit
Title: Re: Lend and Lease Act
Post by: ford_prefect on February 03, 2010, 04:52:42 AM
I would love to see a captured T-34 for the Germans
Title: Re: Lend and Lease Act
Post by: Bauer on February 03, 2010, 11:36:50 AM
I think germnas not reay need captured T-34. We know they use this but they have a msses of theyr own tanks.
Some facts:
http://www.achtungpanzer.com/panzerkampfwagen-t-34r-soviet-t-34-in-german-service.htm (http://www.achtungpanzer.com/panzerkampfwagen-t-34r-soviet-t-34-in-german-service.htm)
T-34 from first picture is great.
 
Title: Re: Lend and Lease Act
Post by: SauerKRAUT on February 24, 2010, 04:41:53 PM
Who wouldn't take a free tank if it works?
Title: Re: Lend and Lease Act
Post by: Mr. Someguy on February 27, 2010, 05:38:25 AM
Lend-Lease as a doctrine would be kinda cool. AT Teams with Bazookas, Call-in Shermans, etc.
Title: Re: Lend and Lease Act
Post by: nbeerbower on February 27, 2010, 06:47:23 AM
I think germnas not reay need captured T-34. We know they use this but they have a msses of theyr own tanks.
Some facts:
http://www.achtungpanzer.com/panzerkampfwagen-t-34r-soviet-t-34-in-german-service.htm (http://www.achtungpanzer.com/panzerkampfwagen-t-34r-soviet-t-34-in-german-service.htm)
T-34 from first picture is great.

I would love to see the Ostheer have that Flakpanzer. :)
Title: Re: Lend and Lease Act
Post by: SauerKRAUT on February 27, 2010, 04:58:20 PM
I am not sure if the soviets ever got ahold of zooks but that part of the mod is done anyway they are not gonna change it...
Title: Re: Lend and Lease Act
Post by: WartyX on February 28, 2010, 07:29:56 PM
I have always been strongly opposed to any Lend-Lease ideas. I always wanted our Soviet faction to feel distinctly Soviet - and part of that was by not simply copy-pasting things from the American faction.
Title: Re: Lend and Lease Act
Post by: Loupblanc on February 28, 2010, 10:48:35 PM

 MrScruffs is at the start of this thread :(
 So many emotions :(

 
Title: Re: Lend and Lease Act
Post by: Zerstörer on March 01, 2010, 05:51:56 PM
Lend lease stuff are cool as long as they're not the stuff already used by other factions.

Eg. The British built Valentine tank was used by the soviets in large numbers(over 2000 of them) and was very popular with its crews. It was also quite effective.

M3A1 scout car was also used in large numbers.

Also there is no point of using Lend lease stuff when you have the soviet equivalents. Not balance or game terms
anyways. Eg why have churchill when you can put it a KV1?
Title: Re: Lend and Lease Act
Post by: Mr. Someguy on March 01, 2010, 10:51:07 PM
I figured the idea would be that since they were given to you, and not made, you could call them in from off-map if you couldn't spare the resources to make your own.
Title: Re: Lend and Lease Act
Post by: hgghg4 on March 02, 2010, 02:06:48 AM
Also there is no point of using Lend lease stuff when you have the soviet equivalents. Not balance or game terms
anyways. Eg why have churchill when you can put it a KV1?

I would rather the KV1, it could damage a panther -_-
Title: Re: Lend and Lease Act
Post by: guynumber7 on March 02, 2010, 02:42:29 AM
actually the 76mm F32 on the KV1 was even worse aganist armor then the 6 pdr on the churchill, so no, it probably couldnt.

in real life maybe from the side or rear but from front, lol no.
Title: Re: Lend and Lease Act
Post by: Paciat on March 02, 2010, 08:10:45 AM
actually the 76mm F32 on the KV1 was even worse aganist armor then the 6 pdr on the churchill, so no, it probably couldnt.

in real life maybe from the side or rear but from front, lol no.
Churchills/Cromwells 75mm OQF was also even worse aganist armor then 6lbs.
There were prototype T-34 tanks with Zis-2 guns (57mm) for better armor penetration.
(http://www.the-blueprints.com/blueprints-depot/tanks/tanks-t/t-34-57.gif)
Title: Re: Lend and Lease Act
Post by: Zerstörer on March 02, 2010, 06:34:33 PM
KV1 had the same gun as T34/76 and couldn't take on the heavies...same with the Churchill.
you can get a KV85 with AP rounds and then maybe...but once again...what's the point when you can get the T34/85

Similar with the T34/57...(its not a prototype btw about 250 where built and used)...why have it when you have the T34/85 upgrade which does the dame thing but even better plus the SUs which are tank hunters
Title: Re: Lend and Lease Act
Post by: hgghg4 on March 02, 2010, 08:15:31 PM
I was stating the sad fact that the Churchill shells bounce of the Panther's ass and doesn't do any damage at all...
Title: Re: Lend and Lease Act
Post by: Paciat on March 02, 2010, 08:24:36 PM
KV1 had the same gun as T34/76 and couldn't take on the heavies...same with the Churchill.
you can get a KV85 with AP rounds and then maybe...but once again...what's the point when you can get the T34/85

Similar with the T34/57...(its not a prototype btw about 250 where built and used)...why have it when you have the T34/85 upgrade which does the dame thing but even better plus the SUs which are tank hunters
Dont want a T-34/57. Just saing that 57mm was better at killing tanks than the early 75mm and 3inch guns.
Title: Re: Lend and Lease Act
Post by: guynumber7 on March 02, 2010, 11:14:50 PM
Yeah the T34/57 was in men of war and was better then both the F32 and F34.

but KV1 had the same gun as early T34, F32, and idk if it was ever upgraded to F34 in KV1.