This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Strayker
1
« on: September 10, 2011, 11:08:31 AM »
Slovakia. 
2
« on: July 22, 2011, 08:43:21 PM »
Leutnant, not Captain. 
Yeah, Lieutenant is required to tech to Field Support Truck, not Captain. Captain is required for teching to Armored Command Truck.
3
« on: July 22, 2011, 08:35:28 PM »
because a) he's not required for teching
Nope he actually is required for teching to Field Support Truck.
4
« on: July 17, 2011, 05:28:35 PM »
Russian and czech translations were mixed up. It will be fixed in the next patch...Ruske a ceske preklady sa pomiesali. V buducom patchi, by to malo byt opravene.
5
« on: June 06, 2011, 10:45:35 PM »
So i was testing some new strats and new maps and etc against the AI. Ive overhelmed him several times on several maps in first few minutes, but then miraculously he recovered and pushed me back to my base and i was almost beaten (Hard AI), until my armor came for the rescue. This has happened to me both as playing as a Axis and as Allies. So i wonder does this new AI cheat? Does he get some +1000 manpower income when hes desperate or am i just dreaming? 
6
« on: June 02, 2011, 09:28:23 PM »
-Since 2.602 patch Recon sections cant build trenches anymore, in EF they can.
-If you play as vanilla brits you will still see 4 building icons, including the glider one, but vanilla brits dont have that building, only RMC does.
Additionaly if you select lets say Field Support Truck through icon and you have the Commandos doctrine and a glider landed it will select that glider instead of the actual building.
-The reward Sherman 105 has some kind of an issue with its barrel...it wont elevate its gun up.
Thats all for now, i hope this will help the team...
7
« on: June 01, 2011, 06:03:10 PM »
You have to redo the Tiger Ace campaign in EF to get the skin in EF.
The Blitz Tiger is still recallable. It also has more effective health at vet 3 than the Ace.
Thanks for info. However the blitz reward Tiger isnt bringing any diversity to the game and it is the same unit it actually replaces, which is contradictory to EF policy of reward units, so something different should replace the vanilla blitz Tiger instead of just a skin change...
8
« on: June 01, 2011, 05:55:01 PM »
Well, i don't think they will return, however I'm working trying to make possible to add the nkvd officer as part of vet 1.
- Vet1: Extra weapons + promotion of a commissar (don't know if the commissar should have a mosin or a toned down ppsh or a normal ppsh)
- Vet2: Capture Heavy weapons (I think i've nailed it but it's too soon to start the party, need to do more tests)
- Vet 3: Unsuppressable
Of course, no matter if my results are positive, they need to be discussed before being integrated  .
Well thats sad, but i dont think that vet system should give them all the advantages. I think that better solution would be their upgrage to NKVD Conscripts again. And i would suggest that the comissar should have the Tokarev TT pistol instead of a sub-machine gun or a rifle...but just my thoughts anyway...
9
« on: June 01, 2011, 05:38:36 PM »
I dont think it needs a buff...it makes blitz Tiger look obsolete even now. Though a suppresion-like ability would fit nice, but im not sure about it. Anyway it reminds me again of the blitz reward Tiger...its not selectable in EF and there can be up to 4 reward vehicles for any army if im correct...so what should replace it?
You can use the blitz reward tiger in EF as well .
Well strangely enough i have it allways greyed-out and non-selectable. Anyway its a crap...it doesnt have any change in statistics and doesnt do anything different from unit which he is replacing apart from different voiceover and skin. So what should replace it...i thought EF policy is that every reward unit should be unique...or am i wrong?
10
« on: June 01, 2011, 05:22:25 PM »
I think they would much more fit to the Propaganda Strategy than the Naval Infantry. Penals could take their place and NI could replace Partisans as a reward unit...thats my 2 cents.
11
« on: June 01, 2011, 05:12:38 PM »
I dont think it needs a buff...it makes blitz Tiger look obsolete even now. Though a suppresion-like ability would fit nice, but im not sure about it. Anyway it reminds me again of the blitz reward Tiger...its not selectable in EF and there can be up to 4 reward vehicles for any army if im correct...so what should replace it?
12
« on: February 02, 2011, 08:18:42 PM »
Ok, first of all the BETA is closing down, NOT the actual COHO project - Meaning what they've actually done is a limited test run of the COHO model. It could even have been used to test how COH2 will run without reviling details on it...you just don't know. Speculating the actual project is finished is way too premature and a rushed conclusion without any evidence.
To be honest, if they are just shutting the game down on them like that, they really should give them the Anthology for free... Why would that be? Did they pay anything in the first place and need some kind of refund?
Actually they have stated, that this is the end of COHO permanently. Although some elements of COHO may be used in their future projects. And some guys have spend their money on COHO cash...which was buyable through real money. Anyway it doesnt look like its their decision...looks like THQ wants to shut some projects which dont pay much...or at least it seems to me like that...
13
« on: February 02, 2011, 01:20:35 PM »
14
« on: January 22, 2011, 12:51:26 PM »
PS Marines Sappers aren't able to repairs SAS Jeeps?
They are able to repair jeeps, but when you lost one of them, you can repair the other one only to 50% health.
No, you can repair it to full, which is 50% of squad health. [/quote] Well thats basically what i meant...
15
« on: January 22, 2011, 12:23:25 PM »
Well, that I can buy both Versions is a deal.
You can buy what you need and can afford at the moment.
And it also differs from the Sherman-upgrade...
Nope it doesnt...its essentialy the same upgrade. You trade infantry firepower for better armor firepower. Its the same case for the 75mm to 76mm and /76 to /85. @Rizz thanks for explanation.
Post Merge: January 22, 2011, 12:25:52 PM
PS Marines Sappers aren't able to repairs SAS Jeeps?
They are able to repair jeeps, but when you lost one of them, you can repair the other one only to 50% health.
|
Show Posts
