Company of Heroes: Eastern Front

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - irik

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 20
31
Off Topic / Re: Mods ideas
« on: January 29, 2012, 02:59:54 PM »
I've heard of the zombie mod before, is it good? I never played it, but it seems good

32
Off Topic / Re: Mods ideas
« on: January 28, 2012, 07:01:09 PM »
It's true. Us americans are dumb, specifically me  ;D.

33
Off Topic / Re: Mods ideas
« on: January 27, 2012, 06:02:41 PM »
Is there anything from the real WW2 that the factions will still use? like ppsh, or mg42, or g43?

34
Off Topic / Re: Mods ideas
« on: January 27, 2012, 04:52:53 PM »
what is this 1949 mod? it seems very cool and i would want to play it when it comes out. it's not dead, is it? I know it's a prolonged ww2, but i don't know.

35
Strategy and Tactics for Soviets / Re: T-34/76 and its attributes
« on: January 26, 2012, 06:08:17 PM »
yup! But when it comes to Allied armor, does going around and hitting their rear armor effective? I know that i don't have to do this, but does it work?

36
Off Topic / Re: Mods ideas
« on: January 25, 2012, 03:05:50 AM »
There were some mods that I wished they were in development.
1. I would like a Talvisota mod for company of heroes. there should be a mix of trenches and mobile warfare. in my opinion, trenches does not go well in vanilla coh. I would like to fight tanks like the t26, bt tank series, and a few others.
2. Or Operation Unthinkable Cold War Style. A US vs USSR conflict with a mix of Cold War and WW2 equipment for both sides. The US would have better equipment, but USSR has better numbers.

37
Strategy and Tactics for Soviets / Re: T-34/76 and its attributes
« on: January 25, 2012, 02:51:34 AM »
T-34s should have to die if they can't survive whatever's thrown at them     ::).

They shouldn't be dying the way you describe. I mean a Sherman can take like 3-4 hits from a 88 gun before dying and we consider that a good tank :P. The same goes for the T-34. IIRC it has slightly less health but keep in mind it cost way less so its more spammable :P. You just need to repair it and its fiine.

And as for a T-34 against a Pershing? Well thats not really looked into when it comes to typical game play. You would need some data for that. But if it takes 3 T-34s to kill a Tiger than Im assuming it takes 3 to kill a Pershing :P. Or less if you micro is good and the Pershing is alone (which it probably wont be :P)

When i'm just screwing around with cpus, i get careless with russian units. a lot of the time, they just die away. when i'm playing for real, either against people or hard cpus, i play for real. I repair my tanks and such. Against easy cpus, they die away.

38
Strategy and Tactics for Soviets / Re: T-34/76 and its attributes
« on: January 25, 2012, 12:51:50 AM »
T-34s should have to die if they can't survive whatever's thrown at them     ::). But whatever, how would t-34 do against allied tanks? not that they would ever fight them, how many t-34s does it take to take out an m26?

39
Strategy and Tactics for Soviets / Re: T-34/76 and its attributes
« on: January 24, 2012, 10:19:39 PM »
especially with 85mm upgrade

remember, all of them had 76mm gun. none of them were trying to get around the kt. as i've said, not all of them got close enough to fire at the kt, and a few were already damaged, which were most likely the t34s that got killed.

40
Strategy and Tactics for Soviets / Re: T-34/76 and its attributes
« on: January 24, 2012, 10:05:22 PM »
Even in a line, it shouldn't take 3 T-34s to kill one lone Tiger if they have 85mm upgrade :-\. Even w/o upgrade they still might win.

The only reason they would be in a straight line in a regular match is if they were all on a bridge and there were tank traps  ::). But at that point we all know what happens ::)

I think I know why a few of my T-34s kill that tank, it was a king tiger, my mistake. they had 76mm upgrade for it is easier to make. Either some of them were already damaged or the other t-34s didn't come quickly enough or were simply not close enough to attack that kt.

41
Strategy and Tactics for Soviets / Re: T-34/76 and its attributes
« on: January 23, 2012, 04:12:50 AM »
comparing isn't the right word. how good is a tiger's speed when contrasted to soviet tanks? i managed to kill a tiger with 20 t-34s, although 3 of them died

42
Strategy and Tactics for Soviets / Re: T-34/76 and its attributes
« on: January 23, 2012, 04:02:58 AM »
let's get back on topic. what are the statistical comparisons of the tiger and t-34?

43
Strategy and Tactics for Soviets / T-34/76 and its attributes
« on: January 20, 2012, 04:34:05 AM »
What are the T-34/76 veterancy benefits? And what are its damage, speed, and armor in comparison to: Panzer IV, Panther, Tiger, and King Tiger? And any other information worth noting? And another thing, is the Lanchester's square law really applicable to tanks? i doubt it

44
Off Topic / Re: Zombies vs Kursk Defense?
« on: January 13, 2012, 10:20:29 PM »
in that case, 90% probability that the red army infantry and tanks will go without firing a round or bullet if them zombies are pwned by artillery and mined.

45
Eastern Front / Re: Stolen German stuff used by Soviets
« on: January 04, 2012, 02:08:46 AM »
I love that movie! it's so good.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 20