This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - AbhMkh
286
« on: July 03, 2010, 08:44:19 PM »
Evaluation Parameters
1. Cost
2.Armor
3.Damage
4.Range
5.Rate of firing
6.pop
7.Line Of Sight
8.Speed
9.Damage vs infantry
P.S : A Tank Destroyer has to be effective on the first 6 aspects(The rest are secondary)
Some people were grumbling about the stug so i've included it in the list..
287
« on: July 03, 2010, 08:23:21 PM »
Will the nashorn or the elefant tank destroyers be included in the ostheer faction? 
288
« on: July 03, 2010, 07:26:32 AM »
Dude u ant use any of the allied tank destroyers against a blob of those annoying stugs except the Sherman firefly
M10 and M18 are very fragile they don't stand a chance against anything heavier than a stug
As to to firing rate all of you must be knowing that firefly gets a reloading bonus at range(its firing speed is to poor at close ranges,even with command tank)
firefly can fire at ranges which only the marder and AT guns
can fire!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I Agree they are expensive but I WAS HOPING THT COH DEVELOPERS IN TOV WOULD REPLACE IT WITH AN M10 ACHILLES SP WITH A COST OF AROUND 320 MP AND 60 FUEL
BUT THEY DIDNT , IT WOULD DISTURB THE BALANCE, INFACT A 17 POUNDER IS SO DEADLY THT A MOBILE ONE WOULD KNOCK OUT GERMAN ARMOR LIKE DUCKS I REALLY WOULD LIKE THE ACHILLES IN THE GAME
AND PACIAT STUG IS NOT A TANK DESTROYER AT ALL(IF ONE DOESNT SEE HISTORICALLY) ITS RELOADING TIME IS 7 SEC
AND FRONTAL ARMOR PENETRATION IS SHIT!!!
WHOEVER SAYS THT HETZER ISNT A TANK DESTROYER IS REALLY ****** OR THE PERSON HASNT PLAYED WITH PANZER ELITE
JAGDPANTHER IS A GOOD ONE BUT IT IS OUT OF OF THE CONTEST DUE TO THE HARD CAP AND THE PRICE!!!!
289
« on: July 02, 2010, 11:17:33 AM »
When i say the best tank destroyer it has to economical as well
su-100 is a damn god tank destroyer but it cant be produced in large nos as its very expensive & i put m26 and t34/85 cuz these are excel at all roles
as to the jagdpanther i wouldnt vote for it at all its too damn expensive!!!!!!!!!!!
we are talkin about vehicles only
I choose Sherman Firefly because its the only tank besides the marder tht can fire without being fired upon(its powerful 17 pounder is the bane of tanks)!!! and its economical as well
u can produce considerable no of fireflies
by the best i mean excelling on all the parameters ive mentioned!!!
Post Merge: July 02, 2010, 11:19:59 AM
"You should've made an actual poll so we can see the results easier."
Then perhaps you could make a poll???
Post Merge: July 02, 2010, 11:22:51 AM
panther doesnt have the range and is too expensive
Post Merge: July 02, 2010, 11:25:49 AM
By tank destroyers i mean the tanks strictly meant for anti tank role(multipurpose tanks can be included only if they have the required guns like t34/85-85mm gun, persinh-90 mm gun etc)
Stug is not a tank destroyer its 75 mm gun is too weak
290
« on: July 02, 2010, 08:03:37 AM »
With the introduction of the Russian faction i was wondering which faction has the best tank destroyer!!!!! Here are the evaluation parameters.. 1. Cost 2.Armor 3.Damage 4.Range 5.Speed 6.Line Of Sight 7.Rate of firing 8.Damage vs infantry Here are the potential canidates(ill start with the americans and end with PE) Allied 1. m10 2. m18 3 m26 4 . Sherman Firefly 5 su85 6 su 100 7 is 2 8. isu-152 9. t-34/85 Axis 1.Panther 2.Tiger 3. Tiger-2 or KT 4. geshutchwagon 5 marder-3 6 hetzer 7 jagdpanther (The Germans had a few more like the nashorn and the elefant tank,since they are not in the game im not considering them) My vote goes to the "Sherman Firefly" Whts your pick?
291
« on: July 02, 2010, 05:45:26 AM »
Allright!!!!!!!!  heck with the t-90 , I'm basically a British player Each one of us have our own opinions!!!!!!!!!!  Thank You gentlemen for your "valuable" inputs.. But ever since the soviets have been included , i don't fear the German armor anymore ,soviet armor can crack open panthers and tigers with ease(earlier i had to scramble fireflies for the same purpose)....
292
« on: July 01, 2010, 09:09:31 PM »
Of course diff players diff strategies
and my apologies(my mistake regarding pacists post), i misunderstood it, as to the role u have mentioned it the t-70 can perform it very well too,i see no reason why i should choose a t-90 over a t-70??
293
« on: July 01, 2010, 08:12:22 PM »
Mr dennis i think you have never tried a t-90 against a blob of infantry, what good is an armored vehicle that cant perform well against infantry or armor,and as mr pacist mentioned the t-90 is pretty much useless and is not worth the investment and im not comparing the t-90 and the t-70, given a choice between m8 and m3 which one would you prefer to send out first,obviously an m8 cuz of its sustainability on the field
However one would use an m3 quad late game as support anti-infantry
m3 quad can suppress at long ranges and shred blobs of infantry(those irritating PE shrecks)
coming back to the point one would never use t-90 late game cuz neither is it good against infantry nor armor(its just not worth the investment late game or early game)
Thts why im arguing to make it an anti infantry unit(btw there is a scope for aa against those really irritating henschel aircraft),i hate those
& Im no novice to COH ive played the game from the first instalment to the last!!!!!!!(way back in 2006)
294
« on: July 01, 2010, 05:16:24 PM »
dude what do you think u use the t-90 for? Without the stats i mentioned its good for nothing vehicle the t-70 is far better than it in multipurpose role.. And as to your said role thing.. the t-90 is specifically designed for aa role(the game mentions it) , and with the weapons it has(two dpshk 28 mgs) it should shred infantry(im specifically quoting the m3 quad)...
295
« on: July 01, 2010, 05:20:43 AM »
I was playing with British with soviets as an ally.. I found a 120 mm soviet mortar whose crew were KIA I re crewed it took all the four sappers,however their repair ability was still showing in their UI , I tried it and lo and behold!!!! They repaired my fireflies,the sapper-mortar squad repaired the tanks, is this a general bug or am i facing this for the first time?
296
« on: July 01, 2010, 04:18:26 AM »
297
« on: July 01, 2010, 03:45:46 AM »
Well a person should have figured that out himself  Obviously underpowered with what its supposed to do my point is every aa unit in this game is a bane of infantry then why not the t-90(its stats are very poor in comparision 3,4 something like this I dont remember precisely!!!! I think the stats should be 12vs infantry 1 or 2 vs light armor and 0 against the rest?
298
« on: June 30, 2010, 08:23:08 PM »
what im saying is vehicles with weapons similar to t-90 do massive damage to infantry but no or very little damage to vehicles m3&wirblewind(11 vs infantry),the t-90 should be like tht
299
« on: June 30, 2010, 07:59:28 PM »
Shouldnt the T-90 have stats similar to a m3 halftarck(quad upgraded) or a wirblewind in its damage to infantry???
Its pretty much similar to those vehicles....
300
« on: May 05, 2010, 09:22:12 AM »
Hi,I have company of heroes opposing fronts installed(v 2.100)
I have installed COHEF but nothing new shows up please tell me whats wrong
|
Show Posts
