[6] Zach Mckenna attacks #1 Beach assault [Axis defeat]

[Dann88]

See Cranial? Now they demand it must be a 3 STRAIGHT VICTORIES! This time you should tell me to "calm down" and I think I should tell you: "I told you so".

[GodlikeDennis]

We are Allies, so they need 3 straight victories. We need only 1 victory to secure the sector. However, I think this should've only applied to D-Day and not for subsequent rounds.

[Pac-Fish]

However, I think this should've only applied to D-Day and not for subsequent rounds.

Maybe we need a new rule 

[JB23]

However, I think this should've only applied to D-Day and not for subsequent rounds.

Maybe we need a new rule 

Nah the rules clearly state that these territories are stacked to stop allies getting steam rolled, they serve that function.

They're like the territories around Berlin and Vienna, which also have the same function.

[Cranialwizard]

However, I think this should've only applied to D-Day and not for subsequent rounds.

Maybe we need a new rule 

Nah the rules clearly state that these territories are stacked to stop allies getting steam rolled, they serve that function.

They're like the territories around Berlin and Vienna, which also have the same function.

This. "D-Day" or "Beach Sectors" apply to sectors #1 or #2, where allies always have the advantage. It's been the rules written like this. If there is an appeal to make them best of three then do so.

Zach Mckenna, just a heads up, I will set the game up as this;
Name: Ef tourney battle for sector 1
password: utah
Also, do you need 3 straight victories or just best of 3, as I see on the map thread it is considered a stacked battle.

You, the Axis, need 3 straight victories to win.

See Cranial? Now they demand it must be a 3 STRAIGHT VICTORIES! This time you should tell me to "calm down" and I think I should tell you: "I told you so".

Calm down. You're constantly trying to make a big deal out of things that are not a big deal.

[Panzer4life]

I am getting online now, meet me in the match that I described.

[Dot.Shadow]

May I suggest a compromise? The zones in mention will only remain stacked terretories for X amount of turns. If the Allies are still stuck on the beaches after a long war they sure haven't been pushing hard enough, and that should come at a prize.

[Pac-Fish]

Realistic and historically speaking, if they are stuck there for like 6-8 months (which is like 4 weeks EF tourney time) then they are probably going to die . But as for tourney rules, its up to you guys to debate it.

[Panzer4life]

Zach Mckenna won with a staggering 1-0, since this was stacked matched and I lost the first battle. Anyway, I need to practice with PE, or see about a change of uniform. :/

[JB23]

May I suggest a compromise? The zones in mention will only remain stacked terretories for X amount of turns. If the Allies are still stuck on the beaches after a long war they sure haven't been pushing hard enough, and that should come at a prize.

Or just remove stacked territories entirely, for both sides.

It's impossible for the attacker to win on them anyway.

[Cranialwizard]

May I suggest a compromise? The zones in mention will only remain stacked terretories for X amount of turns. If the Allies are still stuck on the beaches after a long war they sure haven't been pushing hard enough, and that should come at a prize.

Or just remove stacked territories entirely, for both sides.

It's impossible for the attacker to win on them anyway.

Stacked Territories are designed to prevent steamrolling armies from entering capitals instantly.

[Cranialwizard]

May I suggest a compromise? The zones in mention will only remain stacked terretories for X amount of turns. If the Allies are still stuck on the beaches after a long war they sure haven't been pushing hard enough, and that should come at a prize.

This was what has previously been suggested and I figured that once the Allies took over both beach sectors that they are no longer stacked, however I never wrote an "Official" rule for that.