Romania is the perfect example why WW2 cannot be interpreted without knowing WW1. In WW1 Romania teamed up with the winners (ANTANT) and took huge chunks away from neighboring countries without contributing to the victory itself. Got Transylvania from Hungary with 3 million Hungarians and only entered WW2 to be able to keep this territory because Hungary was about march thru alongside the Germans. Just twenty years earlier the Romanians were fighting against the Germans, Austrians and Hungarians then switched sides to be with the appearant winners of the new world war. Turning on its former allies the French and British - the very states that rewarded Romania with huge territories. Opportunisticly I might add. The German only needed a former enemy because of the oil fields of Romania and a buffer zone between The Reich and Bolsevism. Romania did not fight against Bolsevism, Romania entered the war to sit at the table after the war and enjoy rewards again for no significant contribution in the war effort itself. Again. Then, when things went bad and Germany was losing the grip on the war Romania figured the winners are on the other side. So backstabbed its allie Germany. Are you counting? Switching side for the third time in only three decades. Fought WITH the Bolsevists because the Romanians always wanted to end the war on the winner's side for possible rewards. Then re-occupied Transylvania once more and took it from Hungary once again with all its Hungarian population just to mistreat those people for decades to come.Are you serious about including such a country portrayed and giving it a role? In what? Backstabbing? Psyhopat, stop your crap about Romania's heroism! The Romanian army did not have a single achivement during either wars other then trying to make friends with the winners all the time. No principals, no real goals, no belief, no sense of partnership and no backbone to stick to its allies ever. Just the greed to take something it couldnt alone. I am sick and tired of this horseshit about the might of Romania. Face it, your country (not you) was a backstabbing traitor, swinging from left-to right-to left again- to right again just to end the war on the winners' side. That does not deserve portraying!The Hungarians could not make a significant contribution but at least remained allies to the very bitter end and refused the Russian offer "to end the war now, backstab the Germans" while their country was all but destroyed by the very force offered to end their suffering. I dont care which country is gonna be given any role in Ostheer, i dont care if its the Romanians but pls Psyhopat stop blabbing about how great a country and allie Romania was and how it must be portrayed because I dont think the 2d artist on the EF team has enough resources to remake the flag every time the Romanians decide to switch sides during the play.
Romania was able to destroy or rout all German forces from his territory without help from no one
Polish are famous for one fact happened in WW2 =>has send against german tank division their famous cavalry armed with old fashioned lance from WW1 and Short-bore rifle.They thought about german tanks to be made by cartoon,but unfortunately was not.Imagine the fun of the german tank crew when they saw this "brave attack".Also imagine the shock of the cavalry when they managed to hit tanks with the lance.Very funny i must say Romania was able to destroy or rout all german forces from his territory without help from no one when he decided.Polish army was crushed in the blink of the eye. Romanians strike when they are sure about victory.If is necessary to be thrown in death 300.000 soldiers in one battle romanians do that without hesitation ONLY if the final result is victory on their side.To be brave is different than to be fool.Many countries make mistakes in confusing this two different things.
Author
Topic: Axis Non-German Troops (Read 70634 times)
