Unit - Reward suggestions thread:

[irik]

Wait, TH got replaced? i haven't been playing coh recently, so i wouldn't know. and why are people still hot on mg team?

[Pac-Fish]

TH are still there, just nerfed . And ppl complain about MGs probably cause they thought 1.6 would have MGs. Obviously this wasnt the case.

[irik]

They got nerfed? in what ways? I'd say Soviet Union is better off WITHOUT an mg team lol.

[Pac-Fish]

They got nerfed? in what ways? I'd say Soviet Union is better off WITHOUT an mg team lol.

I think THs do less dmg per shot  . Not fully sure. Check changelog

[GodlikeDennis]

THs had their penetration at long range nerfed but also had their cooldown at short range reduced. This way, their shots will bounce a lot more at range but they will fire faster and thus be more deadly at short range.

[sandycaesar]

Would it be possible to post a side-by-side comparison of the Soviet Firebase, the British 25 pounder, and the American Howitzer? From what I see, the Allies have artillery coming out the wazoo. The Howitzer is doctrinal, true, but Infantry Company is a common choice anyway. So it might be possible to replace one of them with a reward unit; I have the idea of a 4.2 inch Chemical Mortar pit for the Americans firing incendiary/smoke WP, but I'd rather not toss that out as a proper suggestion just yet.

[Pac-Fish]

Would it be possible to post a side-by-side comparison of the Soviet Firebase, the British 25 pounder, and the American Howitzer?

IIRC GLD was suppose to do some sort of tips of the week thing (involving the SU firbase) but that never happened . Ask him

[MBJrP36]

TH are still there, just nerfed . And ppl complain about MGs probably cause they thought 1.6 would have MGs. Obviously this wasnt the case.

This has never been a problem for me, I either;
1: Take one from the enemy's cold dead hands
2: Wait for allied support
3: Get them from an allied paradrop

The Soviet's main advantage is their horde and specialists, a mg would just slow them down IMO.

[Tankbuster]

I'd prefer the term Tide instead of Horde, makes them feel more glorious.

[stealthattack1]

I'd prefer the term Tide instead of Horde, makes them feel more glorious.

LOL, spam, but funny spam. XD 

[Mr.ious.Q]

I have a suggestion, would you guys consider to arm the tank riders ( Tankodesantniki) with the body armor SN-42 since i just came across it  on wiki

[stealthattack1]

i think that the tank riders are exactly the same as guards or shock guards if you have the upgrade. so if you improved tank riders you would have to improve guards as well.

[irik]

I have a suggestion, would you guys consider to arm the tank riders ( Tankodesantniki) with the body armor SN-42 since i just came across it  on wiki

I wouldn't be for it. Sturmovie Ingenery have SN-42, if i'm not wrong. Sturmovie Ingenery can support tanks well, they're good fighters for units that can repair.

[Pac-Fish]

I have a suggestion, would you guys consider to arm the tank riders ( Tankodesantniki) with the body armor SN-42 since i just came across it  on wiki

Are you suggesting a upgrade that helps them fight better or just a change in looks? If its an appearance change then I dont know, ask devs

[Mr.ious.Q]

Guys, i have another suggestion on the model of the naval infantry. Having nothing to offend, the naval infantries look really cool and badass but i consider that they would look better if you guys could give them another feature is the SSh-40 helmet which was also used by the naval infantries in the war . And i think 2 members of the team, especially the ones that carry upgraded weapons (DP, PTRD) , could have the helmet, and the rest keep their old out-fit.