Sneaky Peaky for the next update!

[Raider217]

Now the SU have their own arty and a new-shining AT emplacement *bling bling

It's anti infantry and anti light vehicle not AT, just so you dont get confused.

[Blackbishop]

Now the SU have their own arty and a new-shining AT emplacement *bling bling

It's anti infantry and anti light vehicle not AT, just so you dont get confused.

He meant the M-30 as well XD... but  that doesn't counts, like the SU-76, their old models were placeholders afaik .

[Dann88]

Hmmm... In the picture of jagpanzer IV, there are two kinds of them :|. One with muzzle break and one with longer barrel and a tank commander. Why?

[Raider217]

Jagdpanzer now has access to its own upgrades. One is the fully upgraded version the other is the base model.

[Walentin 'Walki' L.]

The zis emplacment looks cute .

[RedGuard]

It's a beast!

[Venoxxis]

EF roxx.

[Shwepps]

Hi all!
Grand thanks for your work!
But some defects there is for me(or not only for me? ). They concern the Red Army:
A very big difference/gap between infantry and vehicle. Tanks available after very long time and a path to the creation of their very expensive (improving, herself price etc.). Infantry can't fighting with enemy armored vehicles and from there goes weak of Red Army. For example, when you are in war with USA, Britans and USSR the latest power - USSR - you simply not see at battlefield (recruits not count). Some problems you have with play Reds too. So, what I propose:
1) Add a light tank BT-7. It will be a connecting link between infantry and tanks.
2) Just a little lower the price of improving that gives possibility to build tanks, recruitment infantry and, may be, price of the tanks.
3) In contrast to this increase the power of guns Tigers(especially King Tiger) and Panteras.
May be all...The latest and 2part of second not so critical, but first must be, else USSR, after adding Ostheer, will be the weakest element of Allies(however, even now).

[RedGuard]

^^ you need map control to roll out armor, so if you're not utilizing soviet battle doctrine correctly by being aggressive and taking and denying resources your not going to benefit from their mid-late game units/upgrades.

step your early game up and your problem will go away

[Shwepps]

My problems are small, big problems have AI In addition, BT-7 was a very spread in ed Army, so introduction his in USSR forcer will be historically truthful
Again, USSR need one more vehicle for bridging the gap between infantry and tanks

[BurroDiablo]

Bridge the gap between infantry and tanks, by adding in another tank? That doesn't make much sense. Wait until the next patch, there's stuff I don't think we've announced yet.

[Walentin 'Walki' L.]

So will the soviets now have a mobile AT and a static AT? That's kinda stupid because the brits only have a static AT and it's enough for them.

@ Shwepps
Every faction has disadvantages for soviets it's the leak of ammo and the ammo upkeep cost.

[cephalos]

ZiS-3 seems to be something more than just AT emplacement. ZiS-2 got better AT properties, so ZiS-3 is going to be all-purpose gun. Am I right?

[GodlikeDennis]

ZiS-3 has much longer range, is hardier, does slightly less damage to vehicles and is very accurate against infantry. It has a decent splash, able to kill a couple men with each shot. Obviously though, the downside is that it can't move.

[Max 'DonXavi' von B.]

So the best counter to it are mortar or MHT, right?