Company of Heroes: Eastern Front

Author Topic: Comparison of Rangers and Airborne  (Read 6937 times)

pariah

  • Guest
Re: Comparison of Rangers and Airborne
« Reply #15 on: July 12, 2011, 02:33:15 PM »
Thanks. :)

Offline Mattdamon07

  • Commissar
  • ****
  • Posts: 273
    • View Profile
Re: Comparison of Rangers and Airborne
« Reply #16 on: July 20, 2011, 01:53:27 PM »
rangers are good for early game, airborne for late. rangers have lower hitpoints and there M9Bazooka arent as good as the recoiless rifles. rangers are better versus inf but need to be in groups to for max effect, airborne better spread out and in flanking positions, also airbone is probs the best chance for inf against knights cross holders.
Eviction [WIP]
"What is it !? I am busy Fighting Americans!"- Stormtrooper.

Offline GodlikeDennis

  • Donor
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 4454
    • View Profile
Re: Comparison of Rangers and Airborne
« Reply #17 on: July 20, 2011, 01:56:45 PM »
Airborne are fucking awful against infantry. I would never use them against KCH. Rangers with armour-ignoring Thompsons are much more effective against them.
If you get into an argument with me, you're wrong.