Company of Heroes: Eastern Front

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - limon553224

Pages: [1]
1
Balance Discussion / Re: do you agree with this?
« on: May 31, 2011, 11:04:38 AM »
yes i usually dont use all upgrades but its too expensive
other fractions is less expensive then russians i  still think that upgrades costs need to be lowered
i agree that sometimes i dont need something but 85 fuel to produce tanks is to expensive and its not good on short maps because there is not so much resources....

2
Balance Discussion / do you agree with this?
« on: May 31, 2011, 01:12:12 AM »
its not fair that soviets tanks decrese ammonation icome(
there is too much upgrades and it cost is too big(
lower it pleeeeeease its undalanced ,the best balance between costs and upgrades (not including arsenal upgrades) was in v 1.0
and there is too much upgrades needed to make some units
many pepole will be agree with me that tanks produce upgrade is too expensive 85 fuel is too much russians maked most expensive fraction
if in v 1.0 tank factory was 90 fuel then now with two upgrades of it it costs 195 fuel (isnt it too much?)
but the new version is much better then previous) hope this post will be considered and taken note of
thx for attention

3
Balance Discussion / Re: Is it just me or is the AI TOO hard?
« on: February 04, 2011, 10:35:22 PM »
This mod is awesome ,great work, but it have little bug what i detected
I played on achelous river with changed position and added Soviets experts .
Then,when they build all buildings on the base they  are stopped and did not do anything(they are only used kv 2 tanks without any infantry or other tanks ,and they dint captured points, dint rebulded destroyed buildings )i think this bug must be corrected thx

4
Ostheer Suggestions / Re: CoH Online contetnts to EF Mod?
« on: August 23, 2010, 12:12:01 PM »

 I have a key for the beta, too, and I also don't like it.
 COH is supposed to be a CHESS game.
 When the more you play the more you get powerful units,
 it turns into a bunch of lv 80's ganking and raping lv 1's.
 It ... separates the community... :p

 It's essentially COH with a tons of restrictions tacked on,
 and trying very hard to look like world of warcraft... :p cmon.

 Why would I want to EXCLUSIVELY play allied-armor
 for ever and ever??...
+1, I agree, the online you have to buy with cash in order to access better upgrades. Even though they say you can't buy a win, with upgrades you can win! Sad truth for a company that beginning to look like another ambitious money making company. I thought they are going to put in new army or even change to a modern warfare, all false news and false hopes! They create the new game for a down to earth reason, money money money and money!  :'(
yes thats the true sad true of our world .How much money they need to comedown and leave gamers without of this ***** micro buys

5
Announcements / Re: Eastern Front Patch 1.23
« on: August 08, 2010, 06:45:30 PM »
why i have pink gockiss? :-[

Post Merge: August 08, 2010, 06:47:10 PM
and when somebody destroying this game is crashing

6
General Discussion / Re: Idea about su 85,100
« on: May 26, 2010, 11:56:37 PM »
For gods sake.

Why oh why is there such a consistent demand for a tank that does EVERYTHING?

Yes, the su has issues - so does each and every tank. The onus is on you, the player, to work with and agaisnt those issues, not go crying out for a super tank that fits every bill.

If you find the su is dying too quick then First, check your tactics, check your attack group make up, check that you didnt point the su's big delicate arse towards a hidden pak.

HDLK
i am not full noob i know what su 85 + pak 38 = pieces of scrap metal

Post Merge: May 26, 2010, 11:59:16 PM
I still think what su 85 and su 100 needs more Range of shooting in next pach


7
First poll, be gentle.

I have wondered for some time if the Soviets would benefit from having a jeep/scout car-esque unit. So I would like to know others' opinions on the matter.

Personally I believe that the unit, whatever it may be implemented as, should come from the barracks to provide an alternative to conscripts to add some variety to build orders.

It could also be a unit from the support barracks that requires none of the unlocks so that you may start with support barracks and be able to build a unit straight away. This would be similar to a foundry start (tank depot) as Dark Eldar in Dawn of War where they could build raiders? (can't remember the name - swoop bikes) as a unit similar to jeeps early game. These acted as an extremely glass cannon style unit which required serious micro to be used well. They could be very effective because they could be repaired for free if kept alive and could harass well, nullifying the capping disadvantage you put yourself at. This would allow people to go support start if they wished and add further variety to early game.

Another idea would be to add it as a doctrinal call-in, likely as a 1cp ability on the breakthrough tree. I am opposed to this idea because it limits the jeep to one doctrine, would give away your doctrine quickly and also be quite ineffective by the time it comes out.

Some would argue that the Soviets don't need a jeep because they have no problem with snipers but jeep-like units can be used for more than hunting these.

Thanks for your time. Please stay as on-topic as possible unless you have suggestions for improving my poll-making skills as I'm open to constructive criticism in this regard. If it's about making a "I don't know/I don't care option", go to hell, if you don't like the subject don't vote. Have fun discussing.
I think what ba 64 in sup barraks better

8
General Discussion / Idea about su 85,100
« on: May 26, 2010, 07:52:32 PM »
su 85 and su 100 too weak against any german tank their amor too weak ,Range of shooting too short .
I think su 85 must be something like maroder 3.
thx
waiting for comments.

9
Bugs & Tech Support / Crash after winning
« on: May 23, 2010, 03:49:08 PM »
HELP ,game is allways crashing when i win :(

10
Announcements / Re: Ostheer Doctrines
« on: April 01, 2010, 10:03:25 PM »
IF ostheet will appear in this world it would be necessary to make ostheer equal with sovets instead of superstrong

11
Announcements / Re: Ostheer Doctrines
« on: April 01, 2010, 09:42:21 PM »
If it not a joke that I remove yours of fashions and not to whom I will not advise; the tank mouse against is 2? lol
You read history? Tanks mouse all was 1 and that already in 1945 in Berlin
    The impression that followers is made
Nazis also vent loss on virtual Soviet army

Post Merge: April 01, 2010, 09:48:15 PM
Если это не шутка то я удалю ваш мод. И не кому не посоветую ;танк mouse против ис 2?
Вы историю читали? танков mouse всего было 1 и то уже в 1945 в Берлине
    Создаётся впечатление что последователи
Нацистов и вымещаете проигрыш на виртуальной советской армии  I HOPE IT  JUST JOKE

12
Announcements / Re: Eastern Front Hotfix 1.04
« on: March 07, 2010, 04:30:15 PM »
All your patches only have spoilt red army and have tired out it in full a.s!!!!!! After all these useless patches win for Russians not probably hard!!!!!!!!
I ask you please lower the prices
The tank factory should cost a maximum 90 fuel ,support barracks 40
And still give out to all recruits the weapon  because in game 1944 ear.
 in barracks mast be an armoured car for example ba 64
Thanks for attention. (In a following patch посторайтесь зделать it after all many players are not happy )

Pages: [1]