Perhaps the reason for the delay might be a temporary lull in manpower - more work is not a good idea.
This argument is flawed since Brit always will have Tommies out. I think that it should be cheaper.
Quote from: SavageWorld on March 19, 2010, 11:34:47 PMThis argument is flawed since Brit always will have Tommies out. I think that it should be cheaper.And a Russian will not have ingenery? That argument is also invalid. I think that the vickers nest is critical for Brits to hold far off territories due to their slow movement speed and lack of separate squads. This is not true for Soviets, they will easily have enough troops spare to send. If they could gain a massive capping advantage, and cheaply lock it down, they would be very op. I would prefer for the soviet mg to cost alot but have an interesting effect. Maybe reinforce from them, upgrade with flamers, upgrade to AT rifle/gun etc. This way it could be used to hold a critical point effectively without being spammed all over the map, and also give a nice difference between the others' mgs. After re-reading my post, I personally like the flamer idea. Soviets lack an effective way to deal with their own trenches until they get guards.