Best Tank Destroyer

[Zerstörer]

Stug is only really good vs 'sherman armour' because it gets 1.5 damage modifier against it + good penetration making it almost as damaging as a panther gun 131.25 vs 137.5 (same reload 7 btw!)

[Paciat]

M10 and M18 are very fragile they don't stand a chance against anything heavier than a stug

M-18s are sh** after they decloack. M-10s on the other hand are faster have more armor penetration and have better vet bonuses.
M10 Tank Destroyer :Propaganda Film

I Agree they are expensive but I WAS HOPING THT COH DEVELOPERS IN TOV WOULD REPLACE IT WITH AN M10 ACHILLES SP WITH A COST OF AROUND 320 MP AND 60 FUEL

Archer is better. It shoots backwards. 

AND PACIAT STUG IS NOT A TANK DESTROYER AT ALL(IF ONE DOESNT SEE HISTORICALLY) ITS RELOADING TIME IS 7 SEC

AND FRONTAL ARMOR PENETRATION IS SHIT!!!

Its the same as Marders without lockdown and Gwagons. 
Also historically a random stug on the eastern front usually destroyed 3 tanks before it was lost.

WHOEVER SAYS THT HETZER ISNT A TANK DESTROYER IS REALLY ****** OR THE PERSON HASNT PLAYED WITH PANZER ELITE

Hetzer is similar to vet 2 stug. Everyone knows that.

[Artillerist]

Do You mean "Best tank buster of GAME" or in Real?

70% of all destroyed German tanks on Eastern Front were destroyed by ARTILLERY. 53-K (and later M-42), F-22, ZiS-2, ZiS-3... Only 15% goes to tsoviet tank crews, 5% were victims of aviation, and 10 % fell on MINES.

[Seeme]

Were you guessing? Its very wrong, but a good guess.

[AbhMkh]

If one considers history then the stug assault gun series destroyed more tanks then rest of the German armor , however

"We are considering the game here"

And guys i have made a poll regarding tank destroyers,do vote in it!!!

[TacticalNuke]

Wow nuke, not too tolerant of Seeme today are we?

Sorry god.

[AbhMkh]

And Paciat the archer was built on a valentine tank chassis which was obsolete and very weak!!!

[ThGermanElite]

Why isnt the JagdPanther in there?? D:

But my vote would definitely go -hands down- to the GeschutzWagon

-Supression ability with MG (When purchased)
-Kills Shermans in 2-3 hits
-Decent armor & fantastic damage
-Moderately fast
-Ability to fire extremely fast
-Great distance
-Almost 100% penetration chance
-Cost effective.....definitely worth the money
-Once you get 2-3 of them, and support them, its very hard for the Allies to accomplish ANYTHING with Armor.


 

[AbhMkh]

Mon Ami gwagons have avery poor los fireflies can own any of the german armor if given anti infantary support , gwagon cannot match the range and penetration of the 17 pounder on the firefly!!!!!!

[ThGermanElite]

You have valuable points, BUT the Firefly costs 50 more fuel than the GWagon, and the fire rate doesnt match the GWagon's....especially when the GWagon has the FireRate ability. The Firefly would still die in 2-3 hits from a Gwagon too.

[GodlikeDennis]

I would say the gwagon is out of the running because it is currently an imbalanced unit and in many's opinions' needs immediate nerfing. I believe this will probably be addressed in the next EF patch. I do agree that it is an excellent AT unit though, LoS doesn't matter if they're supported (ie. used properly). Their vet 3 bonus is monstrous, they do disgusting damage (with massive range), are cheaper than the stug they replace and are decent against infantry as well. Weakness would be the low health/marder armour and no turret.

[AbhMkh]

Gwagon is basically made on the hotchkiss chassis(the most useless tank of the game),& its knocked out pretty fast from AT guns and it takes a loooooooooooong time to build...... , however to the firefly vs the gwagon the firefly will win comfortably due its looooooooong range(we should actually try it out in the simulator)....

[Seeme]

And Paciat I wasn't trying to offend you in anyway

[Paciat]

And Paciat the archer was built on a valentine tank chassis which was obsolete and very weak!!!

Valentines were called Montys (Montgomeries) Staghounds becouse they chased Romels troops across N. Arfica.
Armored allmost as good as the Matilda II (a small tank with more armor than a T-34) they were upgunned to 6lbs.
Valentines can be compared to PzIII.

Archer was a better tank destroyer than Achilles - it had a lower profile. If you want a tank destroyer with lots of armor get a real tank!

[Venoxxis]

The varity of british tanks is pretty cool.. maybe we will get a reward unit for the firefly for example or one of the churchill call-in tanks.


But the best tank destroyer is surely the jagdpanther or the Gwagen - i agree.