Company of Heroes: Eastern Front

Author Topic: Sector Co-relation to Maps 2.0  (Read 21408 times)

Offline Kleinburger

  • Soviet Commander
  • Ingenery
  • *
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
« Reply #15 on: May 18, 2012, 11:36:58 PM »
didn't Kuele fight in #49 ? how did he end up retreating to prussia ?
Grandpa, What was it like fighting in the most brutal battle in history ?

Offline Max 'DonXavi' von B.

  • Moderator
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 3462
  • Eastern Front forever!
    • View Profile
Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
« Reply #16 on: May 18, 2012, 11:41:31 PM »
My bad. Corrected it ;)

Lemberg - Baraque de Fraiture - Smolensk - Heiligenbeil - Nobel Dynamite Works - Lorient - Poltawa

Offline GodlikeDennis

  • Donor
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 4454
    • View Profile
Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
« Reply #17 on: May 19, 2012, 10:59:16 AM »
Crani will retreat to 49.

Darc and Neos to 39.

Glimz and Ape to 46.
If you get into an argument with me, you're wrong.

Offline Cranialwizard

  • Moderator
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 3270
  • Unknown Soldier
    • View Profile
Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
« Reply #18 on: May 19, 2012, 12:50:45 PM »
WARNING: Sector 36 will be changed to Duclair (4p) because Kotel (4p) does not exist in EF 1.6.0.2.
"Balancers are 10 a penny"

Offline Dann88

  • Soviet Commander
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 513
    • View Profile
Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
« Reply #19 on: May 30, 2012, 06:48:34 AM »
Update the map please.
I'm drunk now, I'm outranked you in philosophy.

Offline Max 'DonXavi' von B.

  • Moderator
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 3462
  • Eastern Front forever!
    • View Profile
Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
« Reply #20 on: May 30, 2012, 08:25:42 PM »
I'm eaten up by a shitload of work at the moment, but will do my best to update the map this evening.

Map updated. Fuck the rest.
« Last Edit: May 30, 2012, 08:39:22 PM by MaxiKing6 »

Lemberg - Baraque de Fraiture - Smolensk - Heiligenbeil - Nobel Dynamite Works - Lorient - Poltawa

Offline Cranialwizard

  • Moderator
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 3270
  • Unknown Soldier
    • View Profile
Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
« Reply #21 on: May 30, 2012, 08:57:28 PM »
I'm eaten up by a shitload of work at the moment, but will do my best to update the map this evening.

Map updated. Fuck the rest.

Don't worry about positions. Ultimately that's going to be a pain in the ass to edit and we'll play by ear.
"Balancers are 10 a penny"

Offline Dann88

  • Soviet Commander
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 513
    • View Profile
Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
« Reply #22 on: May 30, 2012, 10:31:04 PM »
Positions are now a mess. I'm cool if everyone is cool. :)
I'm drunk now, I'm outranked you in philosophy.

Offline GodlikeDennis

  • Donor
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 4454
    • View Profile
Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
« Reply #23 on: May 31, 2012, 08:06:01 AM »
As far as I can remember, the current positions for deployed players are these:
Allies
GLD/Darc/Neos 39
Ape/Glimz/Cer1oty 46
Crani/Kleinburger 55

Axis
Yauz 29
Simuz/Stealth/Drokslit 38
Ashes/Dzierzan 37
Snugz 49
Keule 36 or 47?
Panzer4life 47
If you get into an argument with me, you're wrong.

Offline stealthattack1

  • Axis Commander
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 713
  • there is no losing, only delayed winning.
    • View Profile
Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
« Reply #24 on: June 07, 2012, 12:47:50 AM »
just a question, it says for the stacked territories that attackers must have 3/3 wins. for D-day, are the allies considered attackers or the axis?


OH FOR CRYING OUT LOUD AND RAPE CEASERS GHOST IN FRONT OF THE CHILDREN!?

Offline Evisela

  • Soviet Commander
  • Ingenery
  • *
  • Posts: 19
  • "Chaotic action is preferable to orderly inaction"
    • View Profile
Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
« Reply #25 on: June 07, 2012, 01:54:55 AM »
just a question, it says for the stacked territories that attackers must have 3/3 wins. for D-day, are the allies considered attackers or the axis?

There is an exception for D-Day, if you look.

"If all of our plans, hopes, and dreams unfolded just as we wanted them to, life would be a much more dull than it already is."
-Mikhail J. Zelinsky

Offline Cranialwizard

  • Moderator
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 3270
  • Unknown Soldier
    • View Profile
Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
« Reply #26 on: June 07, 2012, 03:08:35 AM »
Quote
Stacked games will be 3 games total. The Aggressor must win all of these games, except in the case of D-Day where the Axis must win all of these games.
"Balancers are 10 a penny"

Offline stealthattack1

  • Axis Commander
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 713
  • there is no losing, only delayed winning.
    • View Profile
Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
« Reply #27 on: June 07, 2012, 05:44:17 PM »
alright, thanks for clearing that up. i thought this was the case, but i just wanted to make sure.


OH FOR CRYING OUT LOUD AND RAPE CEASERS GHOST IN FRONT OF THE CHILDREN!?

Offline Cranialwizard

  • Moderator
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 3270
  • Unknown Soldier
    • View Profile
Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
« Reply #28 on: June 12, 2012, 07:43:05 PM »
I would like a list of Axis retreat positions, else I will infer where players will go .
"Balancers are 10 a penny"

Offline Alexander 'ApeMen' J.

  • Global Moderator
  • Poster of the Soviet Union
  • *
  • Posts: 4649
  • Against Jabba and what he has done!
    • View Profile
    • The StarWars Rap :D
Re: Sector Co-relation to Maps
« Reply #29 on: July 09, 2012, 08:27:29 PM »
map updated^^